Lives or Livelihoods? Perceived Tradeoffs and Public Demand for Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions

Research output: Working paperResearch

Standard

Lives or Livelihoods? Perceived Tradeoffs and Public Demand for Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions. / Settele, Sonja; Shupe, Cortnie Anne.

2020.

Research output: Working paperResearch

Harvard

Settele, S & Shupe, CA 2020 'Lives or Livelihoods? Perceived Tradeoffs and Public Demand for Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions'. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3609807

APA

Settele, S., & Shupe, C. A. (2020). Lives or Livelihoods? Perceived Tradeoffs and Public Demand for Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions. CEBI Working Paper Series No. 17/20 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3609807

Vancouver

Settele S, Shupe CA. Lives or Livelihoods? Perceived Tradeoffs and Public Demand for Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions. 2020 May 26. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3609807

Author

Settele, Sonja ; Shupe, Cortnie Anne. / Lives or Livelihoods? Perceived Tradeoffs and Public Demand for Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions. 2020. (CEBI Working Paper Series; No. 17/20).

Bibtex

@techreport{a18a4bf200374866b0ab7acef338a117,
title = "Lives or Livelihoods? Perceived Tradeoffs and Public Demand for Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions",
abstract = "We study the role of cost-benefit considerations in driving public acceptance of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) during the COVID-19 pandemic. In a large-scale online survey experiment with a representative sample of the US population, we introduce exogenous variation in the perceived economic costs and health benefits of shutdown measures by informing a random half of our sample about relevant research evidence. We find that a one standard deviation decrease in perceived economic costs (increase in perceived health benefits) of shutdown measures increases the preferred shutdown length by 13 (11) days. These effects are substantial, corresponding to two times the effect of having a COVID at-risk condition and to approximately half of the Democrat-Republican difference in the support of NPIs. Individuals with an acute and immediate personal exposure to the crisis, either in the form of health at-risk conditions or job loss, however, are less responsive to cost-benefit considerations. Our results provide insights into the mechanisms determining public acceptance of pandemic response measures.",
keywords = "COVID-19, non-pharmaceutical interventions, beliefs, tradeoffs",
author = "Sonja Settele and Shupe, {Cortnie Anne}",
year = "2020",
month = may,
day = "26",
doi = "10.2139/ssrn.3609807",
language = "English",
series = "CEBI Working Paper Series",
number = "17/20",
type = "WorkingPaper",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Lives or Livelihoods? Perceived Tradeoffs and Public Demand for Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions

AU - Settele, Sonja

AU - Shupe, Cortnie Anne

PY - 2020/5/26

Y1 - 2020/5/26

N2 - We study the role of cost-benefit considerations in driving public acceptance of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) during the COVID-19 pandemic. In a large-scale online survey experiment with a representative sample of the US population, we introduce exogenous variation in the perceived economic costs and health benefits of shutdown measures by informing a random half of our sample about relevant research evidence. We find that a one standard deviation decrease in perceived economic costs (increase in perceived health benefits) of shutdown measures increases the preferred shutdown length by 13 (11) days. These effects are substantial, corresponding to two times the effect of having a COVID at-risk condition and to approximately half of the Democrat-Republican difference in the support of NPIs. Individuals with an acute and immediate personal exposure to the crisis, either in the form of health at-risk conditions or job loss, however, are less responsive to cost-benefit considerations. Our results provide insights into the mechanisms determining public acceptance of pandemic response measures.

AB - We study the role of cost-benefit considerations in driving public acceptance of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) during the COVID-19 pandemic. In a large-scale online survey experiment with a representative sample of the US population, we introduce exogenous variation in the perceived economic costs and health benefits of shutdown measures by informing a random half of our sample about relevant research evidence. We find that a one standard deviation decrease in perceived economic costs (increase in perceived health benefits) of shutdown measures increases the preferred shutdown length by 13 (11) days. These effects are substantial, corresponding to two times the effect of having a COVID at-risk condition and to approximately half of the Democrat-Republican difference in the support of NPIs. Individuals with an acute and immediate personal exposure to the crisis, either in the form of health at-risk conditions or job loss, however, are less responsive to cost-benefit considerations. Our results provide insights into the mechanisms determining public acceptance of pandemic response measures.

KW - COVID-19

KW - non-pharmaceutical interventions

KW - beliefs

KW - tradeoffs

U2 - 10.2139/ssrn.3609807

DO - 10.2139/ssrn.3609807

M3 - Working paper

T3 - CEBI Working Paper Series

BT - Lives or Livelihoods? Perceived Tradeoffs and Public Demand for Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions

ER -

ID: 248805268