Informational herding, optimal experimentation, and contrarianism

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Informational herding, optimal experimentation, and contrarianism. / Smith, Lones; Sørensen, Peter Norman; Tian, Jianrong.

In: Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 88, No. 5, 01.10.2021, p. 2527-2554.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Smith, L, Sørensen, PN & Tian, J 2021, 'Informational herding, optimal experimentation, and contrarianism', Review of Economic Studies, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 2527-2554. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdab001

APA

Smith, L., Sørensen, P. N., & Tian, J. (2021). Informational herding, optimal experimentation, and contrarianism. Review of Economic Studies, 88(5), 2527-2554. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdab001

Vancouver

Smith L, Sørensen PN, Tian J. Informational herding, optimal experimentation, and contrarianism. Review of Economic Studies. 2021 Oct 1;88(5):2527-2554. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdab001

Author

Smith, Lones ; Sørensen, Peter Norman ; Tian, Jianrong. / Informational herding, optimal experimentation, and contrarianism. In: Review of Economic Studies. 2021 ; Vol. 88, No. 5. pp. 2527-2554.

Bibtex

@article{0b9036a7bffc49a2a12253e5e9737172,
title = "Informational herding, optimal experimentation, and contrarianism",
abstract = "In the standard herding model, privately informed individuals sequentially see prior actions and then act. An identical action herd eventually starts and public beliefs tend to {"}cascade sets{"}where social learning stops. What behaviour is socially efficient when actions ignore informational externalities? We characterize the outcome that maximizes the discounted sum of utilities. Our four key findings are: (1) cascade sets shrink but do not vanish, and herding should occur but less readily as greater weight is attached to posterity. (2) An optimal mechanism rewards individuals mimicked by their successor. (3) Cascades cannot start after period one under a signal log-concavity condition. (4) Given this condition, efficient behaviour is contrarian, leaning against the myopically more popular actions in every period. We make two technical contributions: As value functions with learning are not smooth, we use monotone comparative statics under uncertainty to deduce optimal dynamic behaviour. We also adapt dynamic pivot mechanisms to Bayesian learning. ",
keywords = "C73, Cascade, Contrarian, D82, D83, Efficiency, Herding, Logconcavity, Mimicking, Monotonicity",
author = "Lones Smith and S{\o}rensen, {Peter Norman} and Jianrong Tian",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2021.",
year = "2021",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/restud/rdab001",
language = "English",
volume = "88",
pages = "2527--2554",
journal = "Review of Economic Studies",
issn = "0034-6527",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Informational herding, optimal experimentation, and contrarianism

AU - Smith, Lones

AU - Sørensen, Peter Norman

AU - Tian, Jianrong

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2021.

PY - 2021/10/1

Y1 - 2021/10/1

N2 - In the standard herding model, privately informed individuals sequentially see prior actions and then act. An identical action herd eventually starts and public beliefs tend to "cascade sets"where social learning stops. What behaviour is socially efficient when actions ignore informational externalities? We characterize the outcome that maximizes the discounted sum of utilities. Our four key findings are: (1) cascade sets shrink but do not vanish, and herding should occur but less readily as greater weight is attached to posterity. (2) An optimal mechanism rewards individuals mimicked by their successor. (3) Cascades cannot start after period one under a signal log-concavity condition. (4) Given this condition, efficient behaviour is contrarian, leaning against the myopically more popular actions in every period. We make two technical contributions: As value functions with learning are not smooth, we use monotone comparative statics under uncertainty to deduce optimal dynamic behaviour. We also adapt dynamic pivot mechanisms to Bayesian learning.

AB - In the standard herding model, privately informed individuals sequentially see prior actions and then act. An identical action herd eventually starts and public beliefs tend to "cascade sets"where social learning stops. What behaviour is socially efficient when actions ignore informational externalities? We characterize the outcome that maximizes the discounted sum of utilities. Our four key findings are: (1) cascade sets shrink but do not vanish, and herding should occur but less readily as greater weight is attached to posterity. (2) An optimal mechanism rewards individuals mimicked by their successor. (3) Cascades cannot start after period one under a signal log-concavity condition. (4) Given this condition, efficient behaviour is contrarian, leaning against the myopically more popular actions in every period. We make two technical contributions: As value functions with learning are not smooth, we use monotone comparative statics under uncertainty to deduce optimal dynamic behaviour. We also adapt dynamic pivot mechanisms to Bayesian learning.

KW - C73

KW - Cascade

KW - Contrarian

KW - D82

KW - D83

KW - Efficiency

KW - Herding

KW - Logconcavity

KW - Mimicking

KW - Monotonicity

U2 - 10.1093/restud/rdab001

DO - 10.1093/restud/rdab001

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85118156165

VL - 88

SP - 2527

EP - 2554

JO - Review of Economic Studies

JF - Review of Economic Studies

SN - 0034-6527

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 291019569