Effects of Bilateralism and the MFN Clause on International Trade: Evidence for the Cobden-Chevalier Network, 1860-1875

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Markus Lampe
This study contributes to a revised picture of nineteenth-century bilateralism. Employing a new disaggregated data set, it argues that bilateral treaties did not implement general free trade, but instead reduced tariffs unevenly through commodity-specific preferences, especially favoring manufactured goods. Gravity model estimates show that specific liberalizations increased exports of corresponding items, but not overall trade. Exporters from countries whose governments used bilateralism strategically to bring down partner tariffs benefitted most. Hence, the network in form and outcome is more properly identified with reciprocal liberalization practiced by the French than with British free-trade ideology.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Economic History
Volume69
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)1012-1040
Number of pages29
ISSN0022-0507
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

ID: 16051620