A trade‑of between conservation, development, and tourism in the vicinity of the Andasibe‑Mantadia National Park, Madagascar

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

A trade‑of between conservation, development, and tourism in the vicinity of the Andasibe‑Mantadia National Park, Madagascar. / Casse, Thorkil; Harison Razafintsalama, Manitra; Milhøj, Anders.

In: SN Social Sciences, Vol. 2, No. 12, 12, 19.01.2022.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Casse, T, Harison Razafintsalama, M & Milhøj, A 2022, 'A trade‑of between conservation, development, and tourism in the vicinity of the Andasibe‑Mantadia National Park, Madagascar', SN Social Sciences, vol. 2, no. 12, 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00309-0

APA

Casse, T., Harison Razafintsalama, M., & Milhøj, A. (2022). A trade‑of between conservation, development, and tourism in the vicinity of the Andasibe‑Mantadia National Park, Madagascar. SN Social Sciences, 2(12), [12]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00309-0

Vancouver

Casse T, Harison Razafintsalama M, Milhøj A. A trade‑of between conservation, development, and tourism in the vicinity of the Andasibe‑Mantadia National Park, Madagascar. SN Social Sciences. 2022 Jan 19;2(12). 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00309-0

Author

Casse, Thorkil ; Harison Razafintsalama, Manitra ; Milhøj, Anders. / A trade‑of between conservation, development, and tourism in the vicinity of the Andasibe‑Mantadia National Park, Madagascar. In: SN Social Sciences. 2022 ; Vol. 2, No. 12.

Bibtex

@article{59557e09649c4d64b5d589f0271b0256,
title = "A trade‑of between conservation, development, and tourism in the vicinity of the Andasibe‑Mantadia National Park, Madagascar",
abstract = "We investigated whether there is a trade-off between conservation and development in the vicinity of Madagascar{\textquoteright}s largest national park (Andasibe-Mantadia). The debate on this topic in Madagascar and other countries has focused on polarized questions protecting nature and forest resources or facilitating people{\textquoteright}s rights to exploit forest resources. The prevailing view is that both objectives cannot be achieved simultaneously and that a trade-off is inevitable. The key criterion used to select the four sites for this study was the distance from the entrance to the national park. Our survey data findings indicated that there was no correlation between restrictions on forest use and income or well-being. The villagers enjoy both direct and indirect benefits from the national park, namely the provision of jobs, electricity, water offered by the national park or by private tour operators. The national park and luxury hotels have replaced the state as service providers.",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, Madagascar, conservation, development, livelihoods, tourism, income, Public services",
author = "Thorkil Casse and {Harison Razafintsalama}, Manitra and Anders Milh{\o}j",
year = "2022",
month = jan,
day = "19",
doi = "10.1007/s43545-021-00309-0",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
journal = "SN Social Sciences",
issn = "2662-9283",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A trade‑of between conservation, development, and tourism in the vicinity of the Andasibe‑Mantadia National Park, Madagascar

AU - Casse, Thorkil

AU - Harison Razafintsalama, Manitra

AU - Milhøj, Anders

PY - 2022/1/19

Y1 - 2022/1/19

N2 - We investigated whether there is a trade-off between conservation and development in the vicinity of Madagascar’s largest national park (Andasibe-Mantadia). The debate on this topic in Madagascar and other countries has focused on polarized questions protecting nature and forest resources or facilitating people’s rights to exploit forest resources. The prevailing view is that both objectives cannot be achieved simultaneously and that a trade-off is inevitable. The key criterion used to select the four sites for this study was the distance from the entrance to the national park. Our survey data findings indicated that there was no correlation between restrictions on forest use and income or well-being. The villagers enjoy both direct and indirect benefits from the national park, namely the provision of jobs, electricity, water offered by the national park or by private tour operators. The national park and luxury hotels have replaced the state as service providers.

AB - We investigated whether there is a trade-off between conservation and development in the vicinity of Madagascar’s largest national park (Andasibe-Mantadia). The debate on this topic in Madagascar and other countries has focused on polarized questions protecting nature and forest resources or facilitating people’s rights to exploit forest resources. The prevailing view is that both objectives cannot be achieved simultaneously and that a trade-off is inevitable. The key criterion used to select the four sites for this study was the distance from the entrance to the national park. Our survey data findings indicated that there was no correlation between restrictions on forest use and income or well-being. The villagers enjoy both direct and indirect benefits from the national park, namely the provision of jobs, electricity, water offered by the national park or by private tour operators. The national park and luxury hotels have replaced the state as service providers.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - Madagascar

KW - conservation

KW - development

KW - livelihoods

KW - tourism

KW - income

KW - Public services

U2 - 10.1007/s43545-021-00309-0

DO - 10.1007/s43545-021-00309-0

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 35098154

VL - 2

JO - SN Social Sciences

JF - SN Social Sciences

SN - 2662-9283

IS - 12

M1 - 12

ER -

ID: 291608182