Early Career, Life-Cycle Choices, and Gender

Research output: Working paperResearch

Standard

Early Career, Life-Cycle Choices, and Gender. / Fadlon, Itzik; Lyngse, Frederik Plesner; Nielsen, Torben Heien.

2020.

Research output: Working paperResearch

Harvard

Fadlon, I, Lyngse, FP & Nielsen, TH 2020 'Early Career, Life-Cycle Choices, and Gender'. https://doi.org/10.3386/w28245

APA

Fadlon, I., Lyngse, F. P., & Nielsen, T. H. (2020). Early Career, Life-Cycle Choices, and Gender. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper Series No. 28245 https://doi.org/10.3386/w28245

Vancouver

Fadlon I, Lyngse FP, Nielsen TH. Early Career, Life-Cycle Choices, and Gender. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3386/w28245

Author

Fadlon, Itzik ; Lyngse, Frederik Plesner ; Nielsen, Torben Heien. / Early Career, Life-Cycle Choices, and Gender. 2020. (National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper Series; No. 28245).

Bibtex

@techreport{8f3430e96343416a87034699c0e93eb9,
title = "Early Career, Life-Cycle Choices, and Gender",
abstract = "Do early labor market experiences determine longer-run life and career outcomes, and do they operate differentially for males and females? We study this question in the context of the physician labor market by exploiting a randomized lottery that determines the sorting of Danish physicians into internships, where students with bad lottery numbers end up assigned to less desirable local labor markets and entry-level jobs. Using administrative data that span up to ten years after physicians{\textquoteright} graduations, we study key decisions that determine their longer-run life trajectories. We find causal effects of early-career labor market sorting on a range of life-cycle outcomes that cascade from longer-run labor market sorting, to human capital accumulation, to occupational choice, and even to fertility. Notably, we find that the persistent longer-run effects are entirely driven by females, whereas males experience only temporary career disruptions from unfavorable early-stage sorting. The gender divergence is unlikely to be explained by preferences over entry-level markets, but differential family obligations, attitude toward competition, and mentorship appear to play operative roles. Our findings have implications for policies aiming at outcome-based gender equality, as they reveal how persistent gaps can arise even in an institutionally gender-neutral setting with early-stage equality of opportunity. ",
author = "Itzik Fadlon and Lyngse, {Frederik Plesner} and Nielsen, {Torben Heien}",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.3386/w28245",
language = "English",
series = "National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper Series",
publisher = "National Bureau of Economic Research Inc",
number = "28245",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "National Bureau of Economic Research Inc",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Early Career, Life-Cycle Choices, and Gender

AU - Fadlon, Itzik

AU - Lyngse, Frederik Plesner

AU - Nielsen, Torben Heien

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Do early labor market experiences determine longer-run life and career outcomes, and do they operate differentially for males and females? We study this question in the context of the physician labor market by exploiting a randomized lottery that determines the sorting of Danish physicians into internships, where students with bad lottery numbers end up assigned to less desirable local labor markets and entry-level jobs. Using administrative data that span up to ten years after physicians’ graduations, we study key decisions that determine their longer-run life trajectories. We find causal effects of early-career labor market sorting on a range of life-cycle outcomes that cascade from longer-run labor market sorting, to human capital accumulation, to occupational choice, and even to fertility. Notably, we find that the persistent longer-run effects are entirely driven by females, whereas males experience only temporary career disruptions from unfavorable early-stage sorting. The gender divergence is unlikely to be explained by preferences over entry-level markets, but differential family obligations, attitude toward competition, and mentorship appear to play operative roles. Our findings have implications for policies aiming at outcome-based gender equality, as they reveal how persistent gaps can arise even in an institutionally gender-neutral setting with early-stage equality of opportunity.

AB - Do early labor market experiences determine longer-run life and career outcomes, and do they operate differentially for males and females? We study this question in the context of the physician labor market by exploiting a randomized lottery that determines the sorting of Danish physicians into internships, where students with bad lottery numbers end up assigned to less desirable local labor markets and entry-level jobs. Using administrative data that span up to ten years after physicians’ graduations, we study key decisions that determine their longer-run life trajectories. We find causal effects of early-career labor market sorting on a range of life-cycle outcomes that cascade from longer-run labor market sorting, to human capital accumulation, to occupational choice, and even to fertility. Notably, we find that the persistent longer-run effects are entirely driven by females, whereas males experience only temporary career disruptions from unfavorable early-stage sorting. The gender divergence is unlikely to be explained by preferences over entry-level markets, but differential family obligations, attitude toward competition, and mentorship appear to play operative roles. Our findings have implications for policies aiming at outcome-based gender equality, as they reveal how persistent gaps can arise even in an institutionally gender-neutral setting with early-stage equality of opportunity.

U2 - 10.3386/w28245

DO - 10.3386/w28245

M3 - Working paper

T3 - National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper Series

BT - Early Career, Life-Cycle Choices, and Gender

ER -

ID: 254523046